Tauraso Medical Clinic
Home
Environmental Medicine
Target Ailments
Nutritional Related Diseases
Contact Us
Directions to Clinic
Office Practices
Dr. Tauraso's Curriculum Vitae
Dietary Supplements
Adjunctive Healing Modalities
Treatment Modalities
Dr. Tauraso's Blog
Dr. Tauraso's Medical Updates
Order Online

 

 

Welcome

Saturday, September 13, 2008

MODERN DAY PREVENTIVE MEASURES FOR CANCER – A RETURN TO THE OLD – THE BASICS OF A WHOLE FOODS DIET with AN ADDENDUM

MODERN DAY PREVENTIVE MEASURES FOR CANCER – A RETURN TO THE OLD – THE BASICS OF A WHOLE FOODS DIET

I, as many others, have been interested in the cure for cancer for many years and have explored the conventional and unconventional, the holistic and un-holistic, the natural and the un-natural, even the value of faith healing and the supernatural, almost everything you can imagine. I tried to leave no rock unturned in my quest for the cure(s) of this devastating disease.

There is not a doctor alive who would not like someday to open his front door and exclaim: “I have found THE cure!” Fortunately, the cure has already been found, but only a few are listening. I will repeat: fortunately the cure has already been found, but only a few are listening.

What we are proposing is not new. There are other who came before me who have made the discoveries. I hope only to relight the flame and give new impetus for public awareness and to suggest a different tack to allow the already discovered cures to take hold.

As many others search for a potential cure of this devastating disease, the incidence of this disease called cancer continues to rise.


Could It Be Genetics?

We can reasonably conclude that genetics can be either a direct or indirect cause because our susceptibility and resistence to all our health conditions are based upon our genetics. Because we are made up of genes from both parents, we inherit their genes, and therefore the genetic propensity for both health and unhealthy conditions. Many cancers, such as breast cancer, run in families. Is this genetic predisposition or is the cancer a result of the foods we eat or do not eat or of environmental exposures to toxins and life styles?

Can the hope lie in the study of some populations of native peoples who do not suffer from cancer: namely the Karakorums of West Pakistan (The Hunzas), the aboriginal Eskimaux of North America, tribes of South Africa and South America, the North American Indian, the Australian aborigines, and there may be others. It should be noted and emphasized that these populations do not experience cancer while living in their native habitats. The Hunzas have been studied for over 60 years and the Eskimaux have been observed under great scrutiny for over 80 years. No cancers have been observed in either of these two populations during this time. With respect to the Eskimaux and others cancer was observed among those who left their aboriginal habitat to assume a Westernized way of life.

Could it be that their genetics protected them from this scourge in their native habitat? This is precluded by the facts of no cancers while in their native habitat and cancer while in a Western culture where cancer is endemic. Although they bring their genetics with them, it does not appear to protect them after they move away from their natural habitat. It would appear that moving to a Western culture exposed them to a number of potentially cancer-inducing causes:

1. The actual diet itself;
2. Exposure to chemicals consumed within processed foods and within the overall environment, such as smoking and breathing noxious carcinogenic fumes and gasses (airborne pollutants) which are everywhere;
3. Exposure to aberrant radio waves, such as microwaves, power cables, and cell phones;
4. Exposure to the toxic elements in clothes, detergents, and fabric softeners;
5. Viruses

Could It Be Environmental?
In my opinion, I believe diet contributes considerably to the development of cancer in a particular population. There is little doubt that the diet of aborigine, nomad, and native populations who do not experience cancer is considerably different than what is consumed by westernized peoples. The former eat more natural whole foods consumed close to where these foods grow and more importantly devoid of residual herbicides and pesticides. Although most of these cancer-free populations are vegetarians, the Eskimaux are mainly meat eaters.

Western peoples eat refined foods, such as white rice and flour, refined sugar, sugared drinks, and the ubiquitous chemicals required to preserve and prevent spoiling, etc. They also consume biogenetic fruits and vegetables bred to produce seedless varieties, as in the case of apples, watermelons, other melons, etc. The seeds of many plants, some beans, and other legumes contain the secret of preventing cancer. The eating of these plants has protected the Hunzas and indirectly the Eskimaux from developing cancer.


LAETRILE

Laetrile, Vitamin B 17, a substance extracted from the pit of the almond, was studied extensively as an anti-cancer drug. The original developers, Dr. Ernest T. Crebbs and his son, Dr. Ernest T. Crebbs, Jr., claimed that Laetrile cured many people with all kinds of cancer. But extensive studies by the National Institutes of Health(NIH) and others with NIH grants were unable to confirm their studies. The FDA now bans the use of LAETRILE as an anti-cancer drug. Several states allow its use but not as an anti-cancer drug but as a Vitamin without making any claims to its usefulness to treat cancer. One has to go to Mexico and some European countries where it is legal to receive such treatment.

Why does our Federal Government ban the use of a natural substance which has almost no side effects, while they allow the sale and use of many prescription drugs with many side effects, including death? My mother died from a rather rare cardiomyopathy. She was a diabetic taking DBI – a prescription drug to lower her blood sugar. It was a relatively new drug which was touted to be a wonder drug for the purposes of lowering blood sugar. Three years after my mother died, DBI was taken from the market because they discovered that in sensitive individuals DBI caused a deadly cardiomyopathy. This drug was allowed while the government bans natural safe plant derivatives.

OIL-SOLUBLE VITAMINSAlthough conventional medicine always preaches about the dangers of taking some vitamins – such as too much of the oil-soluble Vitamins A, D, and E – there are almost no deaths from consuming these products.

WATER-SOLUBLE VITAMIN CThey, the conventional medical types, preach that taking too much Vitamin C causes kidney stones. A review of the medical literature reveals NO such cases. They try to scare people from taking Vitamin C,. Why Linus Pauling was taking 30- 40 Grams daily without side effects, and he died in his 90's! I carefully searched the medical literature and found no credible evidence showing that excessive intake of Vitamin C results in kidney stones.

There are, however, other side reactions to excessive Vitamin C intake – stomach pain and diarrhea. So we recommend to our patients that, if either of these two symptoms occur, cut back of the dose until symptoms disappear. We recommend ONLY powdered Vitamin C and not the pills. And, although most of the powdered Vitamin C ingested is excreted in the urine with an hour or two, there appears to be some benefit to the high spikes of C in the system. Additionally, we recommend taking adequate amounts of water when taking C.

BACK TO LAETRILE

The original developers claim that the Laetrile used in the NIH studies was not prepared properly, and this may be true. Drug companies are reluctant to develop drugs from natural sources because they cannot be patented. Drug companies must see a significant profit down the line before they pour millions of dollars into research and the subsequent cost of getting FDA approval for it use.

It must be remembered that the Hunzas and other peoples consume the natural product and not a laboratory-purified substance. It is our desire to purify everything that decreases the effectiveness of a particular substance to do what nature had originally intended.

THE LOGICAL CONCLUSIONSo what are we to do? It makes no philosophical sense to use a purified by-product of a naturally occurring substance which in its natural state is effective. So why not consume the original natural substance – the seed, vegetable, bean, or whatever?

The active substance which has anti-cancer properties is Amygdalin, a substance Dr. Crebbs called “Vitamin B 17.” Chemically, the active compound is Nitriloside. Within the cancer cell nitriloside is hydrolyzed by the enzyme, beta-glucosidase, into a molecule of a non-sugar or aglycone, a molecule of free hydrogen cyanide (HCN), and one or more molecules of a sugar or its acid. There are about 14 naturally occurring nitrilosides found in over 1200 species of plants. It is the HCN which is selectively released within cancer cells because only cancer cells have the beta-glucosidase. Normal cells do not contain the glucosidase to release HCN. Besides normal cells contain the enzyme, rhodanese (thiocyanate transfurase), which detoxifies HCN into thiocyanate. Cancer cells do not contain rhodanese.

Important to note again is that the beta-glucosidase which hydrolyzes the nitriloside to release the HCN is found in large quantities only in cancer cells, but not in normal cells. Without the beta-glucosidase to release HCN, the nitriloside would not be effective.

Philosophically, it might be one thing to consume a natural product over a lifetime to prevent a disease, yet quite another thing to want that substance to cure a disease once it gets established. If we were to compare the situation with cancer with the development of coronary heart disease, we know that heart disease is the culmination of a lifetime of bad diet and lack of proper exercise. Although heart disease can be cured after it is established, it is much better to have prevented it in the first place. To prevent heart disease requires a lifetime commitment to a lifestyle conducive to preventing the disease – a much more difficult situation.

Likewise cancer might better be prevented than cured. A regular ingestion of Amygdalin would more easily destroy early cancer as it might be developing rather than a hugh amount of cancer cells already developed. An amount of cancer-inhibiting Amygdalin might be less to prevent than what might be required to treat an already existing disease.


PLANTS CONTAINING NITRILOSIDE(NB: The following has been excerpted from: www.worldwithoutcancer.org.uk

Foods Containing B17 (Nitrilosides)

Vitamin B17 appears in abundance in untamed nature. Because B17 is bitter to the taste, in man's attempt to improve tastes and flavors for his own pleasure, he has eliminated bitter substances like B17 by selection and cross-breeding. It can be stated as a general rule that many of the foods that have been domesticated still contain the vitamin B17 in that part not eaten by modem man, such as the seeds in apricots. Listed below is an evaluation of some of the more common foods. Keep in mind that these are averages only and that specimens vary widely depending on variety, locale, soil, and climate. SOURCE: The Little Cyanide Cookbook by June de Spain - (former) FDA Toxicologist and Pharmacologist.





Fruits Range Seeds Range Beans Range

Blackberry, Domestic Low Apple Seeds High Black Low
Blackberry, Wild High Apricot Seeds High Black Eyed Peas Low
Boysenberry Med Buckwheat Med Fava High
Choke Cherry High Cherry Seed High Garbanzo Low - Med
Wild Crabapple High Flax Med Green Pea Low
Market Cranberry Low Millet Med Kidney Low - Med
Swedish (lignon)
Cranberry High Nectarine Seed High Lentils Med
Currant Med Peach Seed High Lima, U.S. Low
Elderberry Med - High Pear Seed High Lima, Burma Med
Gooseberry Med Plum Seed High Mung Med - High
Huckleberry Med Prune Seed High Shell Low
Loganberry Med Squash Seed Med
Mulberry Med
Quince Med
Strawberry Med
Raspberry Med

Sprouts Range Nuts (all raw) Range Leaves Range

Alfalfa Med Bitter Almond High Alfalfa High
Bamboo High Cashew Low Beet Tops Low
Fava Med Macadamia Med - High Eucalyptus High
Garbanzo Med Spinach Low
Mung Med Water Cress Low


Tubers Range

Cassava (bitter variety) High
Sweet Potato Low
Yams Low

Range

THIS CHART MAY NOT REPRODUCE WELL IN THE BLOG BUT YOU CAN GET A COPY OF THIS ARTICLE (ONLY IN WORDPERFECT BY WRITING TO: DRTAURASO@DRTAURASO.COM

High — above 500 mgs. nitriloside per 100 grams food

Medium — above 100 mgs. per 100 grams food

Low — below 100 mgs. per 100 grams food

Vitamin B-17 is one of the main sources of food in cultures such as the Eskimos, the Hunzas, the Abkasians and many more. Did you know that within these tribes there has never been a reported case of cancer? According to Dr. Krebs, we need a minimum of 100 mg of vitamin B-17 (the equivalent of about seven apricots seeds) too nearly guarantee a cancer free life. Foods that contain vitamin B-17 are as follows:


KERNELS OR SEEDS OF FRUIT: The highest concentration of vitamin B-17 to be found in nature, aside from bitter almonds. Apple, apricot, cherry, nectarine, peach, pear, plum, prune.

BEANS: broad (Vicia faba), Burma, chickpeas, lentils (sprouted), lima, mung (sprouted), Rangoon, scarlet runner.


NUTS: Bitter almond, macadamia, cashew.


BERRIES: Almost all wild berries. Blackberry, chokeberry, Christmas berry, cranberry, elderberry, raspberry, strawberry.


SEEDS: Chia, flax, sesame.


GRASSES: Acacia, alfalfa (sprouted), aquatic, Johnson, milkweed, Sudan, minus, wheat grass, white dover.


GRAINS: oat groats, barley, brown rice, buckwheat groats, chia, flax, millet, rye, vetch, wheat berries.


MISCELLANEOUS: bamboo shoots, fuschia plant, sorghum, wild hydrangea, yew tree (needles, fresh leaves).


Two rules of thumb: According to Dr. Krebs, the basic concept is that sufficient daily B-17 may be obtained by following either of two suggestions:

First, eating all the B-17-containing fruits whole (seeds included), but not eating more of the seeds by themselves than you would be eating if you ate them in the whole fruit. Example: if you eat three apples a day, the seeds in the three apples are sufficient B-17. You would not eat a pound of apple seeds.

Second, one peach or apricot kernel per 10 lbs of body weight is believed to be more than sufficient as a normal safeguard in cancer prevention, although precise numbers may vary from person to person in accordance with individual metabolism and dietary habits. A 170-lb man, for example, might consume 17 apricot or peach kernels per day and receive a biologically reasonable amount of Vitamin B-17.

And two important notes: Certainly, you can consume too much of anything. Too many kernels or seeds, for example, can be expected to produce unpleasant side effects. These natural foods should be consumed in biologically rational amounts (no more than 30 to 35 kernels per day).

High concentrations of B-17 are obtained by eating the natural foods in their raw or sprouting stage. This does not mean that moderate cooking and other tampering will destroy the B-17 content. Foods cooked at a temperature sufficient for a Chinese dinner, for example, will not lose their B-17 content.

ADDENDUM AS OF 9/14/08:

This article was first published on my Blog on 3/2/08. Since then we have included in our anti-cancer protocol the use of seeds and foods to provide the anti cancer amygdalin and employing the benefits of Cesium Chloride, Vitamin C, and several other all natural agents, known to either inhibit the growth of cancer cells or completely annihilate these cells from the body. Although we are willing to share our protocol with the public, we advise anyone interested to employ our protocol under the close supervision of a physician who knows what s/he is doing. We are willing to do this for you if you wish.

Today, we are starting a fund raiser to collect enough money to open our own clinic. Initially we are going to begin by reaching out to the general public through Craig’s List. We are asking the public to purchase an Ebook from our Online Bookstore (http://shop.drtauraso.com/main.sc) (Copy and paste on your browser). If we can entice 200,000 individuals to purchase an Ebook we will have sufficient funds to open our clinic. We are not asking for an empty donation where you will not receive something of benefit to you – that is an Ebook. The small amount of money for an Ebook – less than $8-9.00 – is so small considering the large sums sent to political candidates where we know the money is not well spent! Buy an Ebook which you can download and help us out.

nicola michael (c. Tauraso, M.D.)
Director, Tauraso Medical Clinic
Web site: www.drtauraso.com
Blog site: http://www.drtauraso.com/blog/index.htm
Email: drtauraso@drtauraso.com

Labels: , ,

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home